mini传媒入口

Statement on mid-urethral slings

mini传媒入口

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

Updated
17 August 2023
SHARE

mini传媒入口 supports the use of mid-urethral slings (MUS) in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by appropriately trained and credentialed surgeons, where women make well informed decision on this option.

mini传媒入口 has well evidenced and clear guidance for surgeons who undertake MUS surgery (mini传媒入口 Position Statement on MUS (2022). mini传媒入口 emphasises:

– Surgeons performing MUS (and other gynaecological procedures) should only operate within their capabilities and the scope within which they are credentialed.

– Patients must be given information to make choices on treatment, including benefits, risks and alternative treatment options including doing nothing. All women considering MUS should discuss and be provided with the patient guide developed by the New Zealand Mesh Working Group

– Careful clinical consideration must be given to all MUS procedures and mini传媒入口 supports the use of multi-disciplinary teams to consider cases prior to a decision to proceed

mini传媒入口 understands the consumer concerns behind the recent call to suspend the implantation of vaginally-inserted mesh sling for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). mini传媒入口 acknowledges that some women have experienced significant harm from MUS surgery.

Female urinary incontinence is common and is often debilitating and can substantially reduce a woman鈥檚 quality of life. Non-surgical treatments such as pelvic floor exercises are helpful for some women however, for many women surgery is necessary to provide a more effective and enduring end to their symptoms.

Midurethral slings (MUS) were developed in the 1990鈥檚 to treat stress urinary incontinence, offering a significantly less invasive procedure. An extensive body of literature indicates that MUS surgery is a highly effective treatment for SUI, associated with less pain, shorter hospitalisation, faster return to usual activities, compared to historic options for treating SUI.

The limitation of the medical scientific literature and our local information systems is lack of long term follow up data. Issues related to surgical mesh have emerged as women have been empowered to speak up about their longer-term outcomes, clearly indicating the need for longer term monitoring of outcomes of surgical procedures.

Read in response to the petition to suspend the implantation of mesh sling for stress urinary incontinence.

CATEGORIES
Advocacy Women’s health

LATEST NEWS

Advocacy 14 May 2024
The Federal Budget: What It Means for Women鈥檚 Health
mini传媒入口 has summarised how the 2024-25 Australian federal budget allocations…
Advocacy 9 May 2024
New MBS Items a Win for Women’s Health
mini传媒入口 welcomes the addition of new MBS items which will…
Advocacy 3 May 2024
College Statement on Gender-Based Violence
The College supports the call for the Australian government to…
Advocacy 2 May 2024
mini传媒入口 leads the charge against chronic shortages of medicines & devices used in women鈥檚 healthcare
The College has convened key stakeholders to workshop solutions for…
Advocacy 22 April 2024
Rural, Regional and Remote Women鈥檚 Health Strategy aims to ensure equitable access to women鈥檚 healthcare across Australia
The College has launched its Rural, Regional and Remote Women鈥檚…
Aotearoa New Zealand 16 April 2024
No reputable evidence for 鈥榓bortion reversal鈥 says mini传媒入口
Claims that medical abortion can be 鈥榬eversed鈥 by a dose…
Advocacy 21 March 2024
mini传媒入口 reaffirms commitment to First Nation peoples following Voice to Parliament Referendum Result
Read the College鈥檚 post-referendum statement and learn more about the…